Depth Perception

A recent workshop hosted at the UEA as part of the ‘Inner Lives’ project, which investigates emotions and the supernatural from the medieval to the modern period had me thinking again about some of the key problems that structure how historians have thought about selfhood and subjectivity. What did I take away? A sense that the […]

Read more "Depth Perception"

The Art of Apparent Artlessness

There is an unspoken ideal among many academic historians when it comes to style. A good way to think of this is as ‘the art of apparent artlessness’. Wilhelm Roscher used this phrase to discuss the way Thucydides wins over his readers unawares, subtly seducing their thinking, without making his argument explicit.[1] This style of […]

Read more "The Art of Apparent Artlessness"

A Room of One’s Own?

This post on office space in UK higher education history departments is based on an online survey that 174 people filled in via a link I tweeted out last week. The survey asked respondents about their employment conditions, employer, and office space. Three apologies before I begin: 1. I didn’t ask about age, disabilities or gender, […]

Read more "A Room of One’s Own?"

The Shadowy Monsieur G

The simplest story is the one which always has the best chance of being believed, usually it corresponds least to the facts.[1] I am writing the story of a murder in 1925 by peering over the shoulder of someone else. More specifically, I am peering over the shoulder of a shadowy figure named Monsieur G. Monsieur […]

Read more "The Shadowy Monsieur G"

Fate in Fact

Should historians be more honest about their intuitions? Take the example of how historians imagine their subjects as characters. In his book Poetry in the Making, Ted Hughes tells a story about how the novelist H.E. Bates was in the habit of making up biographies for people he came across: Some of these little fantasies […]

Read more "Fate in Fact"